[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: ME: RE: I'll start a new thread then...


A long time ago when I first met Nicolas Lorain at Sun, we discussed the
convergence of PJava and J2ME.  PJava seems so terrific for 32 bit PDAs, we
had a long chat about how the rift was greater than some might have liked.

Specifically, I can get an iPAQ with 64 MB and a big screen, and yet J2ME
doesn't have the UI widgets or RMI classes that serve app developers so
well...

kb

-----Original Message-----
From: me-admin@enhydra.org [mailto:me-admin@enhydra.org]On Behalf Of
Jason Anderson
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 4:42 PM
To: me@enhydra.org
Subject: RE: ME: RE: I'll start a new thread then...


At 11:02 AM 8/30/01 -0700, you wrote:
>I hadn't really thought about CPU issues as you raise them here.
>
>Have you taken much interest in the J9 work at IBM and the JBed work at
>esmertec?  I'm curious if these are viable CPU specific solutions, or if a
>big ISV would actually feel the need to own the JVM/KVM themselves...
>
>keith

I haven't looked at those yet, but I will do so since you mentioned them.
(Disclaimer: Wind River also ships a commercial JVM, with a PersonalJava 3.1
library set.) In theory a person should be able to select any compliant JVM
that is compatible with their hardware platform, as long as EnhydraME code
works with the JavaME spec.

-Jason

_______________________________________________
ME mailing list
ME@enhydra.org
http://www.enhydra.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/me