ME: Re: ME: kSync, SyncML

Hi all,

I'd like to underline that the Enhydra ME project rreally should focus on the the wireless needs. Further the integration of existing mobil standards, stated by the leading device manufacturer (Nokia, Motorola, Siemens, Ericson, ...), will be a key of success.

Does the EnhydraME project have any cooperation with the leading companies? Which are the user groups (operators, device manufacturer, content provider)?

The idea behind EnhydraME is quite okay. We should keep in mind to give the end-user as much as benefits we can. I'm very interested in this kind of mbobil framework hence I will inform myself about the projects concepts and it's feasibility.

Thanks for initiating such a big project. I'm very interested in the architectural concepts and the technologies standing behind the scene.

best regards

Alfred

>From: "Sean C. Sullivan"

>Reply-To: me@enhydra.org

>To:

>Subject: ME: kSync, SyncML

>Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 14:11:23 -0700

>Hello

>I just read the September 10, 2001 press release regarding "EnhydraME"

> http://www.lutris.com/company/pressReleases/Press010907.html

>The press release states:

>"The EnhydraME project is also announcing the creation of the following five

>additional

> J2ME infrastructure components that will soon be launched on the EnhydraME

>project:

> [...]

> a.. kSync - An implementation of SyncML for synchronization of both

>database and

> application session state.

> [...]"

>What are the goals of the kSync project?

>What is the status of kSync?

>Who is leading the kSync effort?

>Is kSync going to be a SyncML client, a SyncML server, or both?

>Regards,

>-Sean

>_______________________________________________

>ME mailing list

>ME@enhydra.org

>http://www.enhydra.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/me